How inclined might you be to surrender gentle drinks? A current survey has determined that many Singaporeans may be willing to forgo their high-sugar liquids for lifestyles. A survey of one,132 Singaporeans carried out via market research company YouGov has found that forty-two consistent with cent of respondents are assisting Singapore imposing a sugar tax, even as many as fifty-eight consistent with cent are in favor of an all-out ban rather.
Out of the 68 respondents with diabetes, 46 have been supportive of a sugar ban, YouGov said. The survey’s findings – released on July 12 – also discovered that respondents of various stages of schooling and profits differed in their views. About half of the respondents with a university degree supported implementing a sugar tax compared to 35 percent of non-degree holders. And around 47 in line with cent of high-income earners – described as the one’s incomes greater than S$8,000 a month – supported the tax, YouGov stated. In comparison, 35 percent of low-profits earners, who earn less than S$4,000 a month, favored a sugar tax.
Half will lessen gentle drink consumption if tax is imposed.
Of all of the respondents, 7 in line with cent devour soft beverages on each day foundation, and 26 in keeping with cent drink gentle drinks weekly. Another 32 consistent with cent eat tender liquids monthly, even as 26 consistent with cent drink them on a yearly foundation. Only nine in step with cent of respondents do now not drink gentle beverages at all. If a sugar tax has been imposed, around fifty-two percent of respondents see themselves decreasing their gentle drink intake, and every other 23 percent will prevent ingesting them entirely. Meanwhile, 23 consistent with cent of respondents will preserve drinking the identical amount of soft beverages, and most effective around 1 consistent with cent will eat even more.
Sugar took into consideration extra addictive than espresso and cigarettes.
When respondents have been requested to rank distinct materials primarily based on how addictive they were, 18 in keeping with cent voted sugar because the most addictive, 2nd only to drugs, which 41 in keeping with cent voted because the maximum addictive. Caffeine and nicotine followed carefully, with each substance voted by using 16 according to cent and 14 in step with cent of respondents respectively. Whether a ban or a tax is imposed, the perspectives of human beings on sugar would be “polarising,” Jake Gammon – head of YouGov Omnibus at the Asia Pacific – said, including that this was due to the fact “it offers with a substance that Singaporeans deem more addictive than nicotine”. One component’s for certain. With bubble tea being infamous for its high-sugar content material, a sugar tax or ban will probably have the biggest impact on many of Singapore’s crazed bubble tea fanatics.